Tool support requires the appropriate API integration; a supported tool is not automatically active in every chat.
Historical API features and tools
Historical text, image and video understanding with text output
A published 262,144-token context in the archived API pricing reference
Former thinking and non-thinking modes for different workloads
Historical tool calling, JSON mode and partial-output workflows; not a current service commitment
Before you choose
The model is retired on Kimi's platform; its older marketing page is not evidence of current API availability.
Agent Swarm was a Kimi product orchestration feature, not a guarantee that the raw K2.5 API or EZ Ai Assist runs a swarm of agents.
A verified maximum output and knowledge cutoff were not established. Do not copy K3 limits or controls into an old K2.5 integration.
Migration to K3 changes reasoning controls and billing, including cache writes. Re-run representative tasks instead of treating a model-ID swap as sufficient validation.
Extended thinking
enableddisabled
The historical model supported thinking and non-thinking modes. These are archival capabilities, not instructions for a currently available endpoint. K3 always uses thinking with its own effort controls; review the replacement's documentation before migrating.
The retained API ID is kimi-k2.5 for identification of historical records, not a recommended live request target.
Separate model capability from Kimi Web/App Agent Swarm orchestration. A copied prompt does not provide external tools or parallel agents.
Record old inputs, expected outputs and usage before moving to K3; check schema compatibility, tool history, completion budgets and new cache-write charges.
Put it to work
Start with a more useful prompt.
Original migration and workflow examples from EZ Ai Assist. Use these with an available model and the appropriate tools; the retired system cannot run new requests.
Workflow 01
Audit an older K2.5 integration
Find migration-sensitive assumptions before changing IDs.
Audit this older K2.5 integration using the code and API logs provided. Identify assumptions about model availability, thinking mode, input formats, tool history and token budgets. Separate confirmed incompatibilities from items needing a test. Produce a migration checklist without executing requests or treating the retired endpoint as available.
Workflow 02
Build a replacement acceptance set
Preserve useful behavior without relying on a retired model.
Turn these representative K2.5 conversations and expected results into a replacement-model evaluation set. Define pass criteria, allowed variation, factuality checks and escalation rules. Remove secrets from examples. Explain how to compare a new model with the recorded baseline without inventing results or requiring new calls to the retired model.
Workflow 03
Separate model and orchestration features
Avoid carrying product promises into an API migration.
Review this workflow description and label each capability as model behavior, application orchestration, external tool access or human approval. Cite the evidence supporting each label. Flag any claim of agent swarms or automated actions that lacks an implemented integration. End with the smallest set of components needed for a safe replacement workflow.
Developer reference
Kimi API pricing
Historical Kimi API information, not EZ Ai Assist subscription prices.
K2.5 is retired on the Kimi platform, so no current purchasable API rate is presented. The archived pricing page is a historical reference, not a live quote. Use K3's current table when estimating a migration.
Do not treat a missing current rate as zero cost or a promise of continued third-party access.
Compare replacement costs using actual input, cached input, output and cache-write usage rather than transferring an old budget unchanged.
Common questions
A few things worth knowing.
Is Kimi K2.5 still available on Kimi's platform?
No. The current model list and changelog identify retirement on August 31, 2026. The changelog says requests return 404 model not found. A retained website page does not override that lifecycle notice.
What replacement does Kimi recommend?
Kimi points to K3. Test your actual prompts and tool loop because K3 has different reasoning controls, completion settings and cache-write billing. This guide links to the K3 page for that comparison.
Why does this page remain on the website?
It preserves an existing public URL and supports audits of older workflows. The historical label distinguishes a useful reference from an endorsement for a new deployment.
Was the API context 128K?
The archived provider pricing reference lists 262,144 tokens. This guide corrects the older catalog shorthand while keeping that capacity explicitly historical.
Did the raw API include Agent Swarm?
Do not equate Kimi's product-level Agent Swarm with a raw model call. Orchestrating multiple agents requires an application system; it is not an automatic feature of the retained EZ Ai Assist catalog entry.
Why is there no current token-price table?
An archived rate does not establish that you can buy access now. The page retains the source for historical comparison but does not advertise a retired endpoint as a current offering.
Are these API capabilities included in my EZ Ai Assist plan?
This guide describes the provider API, not subscription entitlements or a promise that every setting is exposed in the app. Check your workspace for model access and supported inputs, and use the EZ Ai Assist pricing page for plan details.
Check the source
Official documentation
Specifications and API prices checked on . Example prompts and workflow advice are editorial guidance from EZ Ai Assist.