Tool support requires the appropriate API integration; a supported tool is not automatically active in every chat.
Historical API features and tools
Previously orchestrated multiple built-in tool steps to complete a single user request
Combined underlying model routing with a hosted tool workflow rather than acting as one standalone model
Historical integrations included web search, website visits, code execution and Wolfram Alpha
Designed for tasks needing more than the single tool call offered by Compound Mini
Before you choose
The system has shut down. Historical examples and overview pages do not make groq/compound an active API model.
No verified system-wide context, maximum output or knowledge cutoff is stated here; routed-model specifications are not automatically the compound system's limits.
The documented system did not expose arbitrary user-defined custom tools. A replacement must provide its own supported tools and orchestration.
More tool steps add failure modes and potentially cost. Validate citations, execution results and permissions rather than trusting a final summary alone.
Reasoning behavior
Historical Compound behavior concerned orchestration across models and tools, not a documented single reasoning-effort control. In a replacement, separate reasoning depth, tool selection, step limits and termination criteria so each can be tested.
Remove the retired ID from active routing and fallback configuration after reviewing the application's migration requirements.
Define a maximum tool budget, timeout, retry policy and human-approval boundary for the replacement. Model function calling alone does not provide those controls.
Browser automation had already been removed before the system shutdown. Do not treat a historic browser_automation configuration as a working capability.
Put it to work
Start with a more useful prompt.
Original migration and workflow examples from EZ Ai Assist. Use these with an available model and the appropriate tools; the retired system cannot run new requests.
Workflow 01
Map a multi-tool migration
Separate the model's job from the surrounding orchestration.
From the old agent workflow and logs below, map each step to its purpose, required tool, inputs, outputs and failure path. Propose a replacement using currently available components that I identify. Include permissions, timeouts, retry limits and a final validation step. Do not assume a retired system has a drop-in replacement or that any tool is already connected.
Workflow 02
Plan a source-backed investigation
Turn a broad research request into bounded, checkable steps.
Create a research plan for the question below with a maximum of five tool steps. Specify the evidence needed, an appropriate source type, a stop condition and how conflicting results should be handled. If tools are available, request approval before execution; otherwise return only the plan. Do not present planned searches as completed research.
Workflow 03
Evaluate an agent's execution trace
Audit the intermediate work rather than only the final answer.
Audit this supplied agent trace and final answer. For every consequential claim, identify the tool result or source that supports it. Flag unauthorized actions, repeated calls, unhandled errors and unsupported conclusions. Recommend the smallest orchestration changes that would prevent recurrence, with a regression case for each. Do not invent missing trace entries.
Developer reference
Groq API pricing
These are Groq API reference prices, not EZ Ai Assist subscription prices.
Compound is retired, so this guide does not advertise current prices for requests that can no longer run.
A replacement's cost depends on the chosen models, number of tool steps and service terms. Estimate and measure those components separately.
The retirement notice lists no direct replacement or transferable pricing promise. Historical system rates should not be treated as a current offer.
Common questions
A few things worth knowing.
What is Compound's current status?
Groq decommissioned Compound on September 21, 2026. Its model ID no longer accepts supported requests. The changelog and deprecation notice take precedence over older descriptions of an available system.
Was it just another language model?
No. Compound combined underlying models with built-in tool orchestration. Replacing it can require changes to tool execution, retries, permissions and result validation, not just changing a model string.
Did Compound Mini survive the shutdown?
No. Both groq/compound and groq/compound-mini were decommissioned on the same date. Switching to Mini is not a supported way to recover the old service.
Which model replaces it directly?
Groq lists no direct replacement. Select a current model and supported tools based on your workflow, then test the complete integration. This guide does not invent a replacement endorsement.
Should I retain the old API configuration?
Keep historical configuration for audit or migration reference where appropriate, but do not rely on the retired ID for active traffic or fallback. Review scheduled tasks and retry loops that might keep sending failing requests.
Why does this guide include migration prompts?
They help an available model analyze requirements, plan safe research and audit execution traces. They are original workflow aids, not runnable examples for the retired endpoint.
Does this notice prove the model is unavailable in every app?
It establishes Groq's API lifecycle, not the internal routing of every application. Check EZ Ai Assist for current workspace access and do not infer app behavior from a catalog entry alone.
Check the source
Official documentation
Specifications and API prices checked on . Example prompts and workflow advice are editorial guidance from EZ Ai Assist.